"Why Most Published Research Findings Are False" -Ioannidis

Dear All CSS Members:

Enclosed is a reprint of an article by Ioannidis (click here for article). It highlights why most of the evidence upon which we base our decisions is so weak. Frankly, most of our retrospective, cohort studies which are level 4 are nothing more than an inaccurate snapshot of what we think we achieve with our surgery. Thus, if value is our goal, we really can't distinguish which treatment is best. Even Level I, Prospective Randomized studies (which are difficult to do in surgery) are often proven wrong by similar studies. Thus, if our mission is to provide the best evidence for our treatment in order to deliver value, we are standing on very unstable ground with the evidence we have. I thought this would be of interest, and I'm just saying........maybe we can do better.

Kind Regards,

Jon JP Warner, MD

Chief, MGH Shoulder Service

Boston Shoulder Institute

Founder, The Codman Shoulder Society

Recent Posts

See All

Arthroscopic Rotator Cuff Repair: Science & Art

Dear CSS Members and Colleagues: There are thousands of opportunities to see how to think about and do an arthroscopic RCR. I created 3 videos to illustrate my approach learned after 30 years (actuall

Critical Shoulder Angle Controversy

Dear CSS Members and Colleagues: Christian Gerber has said, “If two people agree one is not a surgeon.” Gerber also gave us the concept of Critical Shoulder Angle (CSA). So, there is a  controversy re

TSA: A Value Proposition for VR & MR

Dear CSS Members and Colleagues: Enclosed is a video (see link below) which considers both the strategy and execution of shoulder arthroplasty. By now most of you are familiar with VR (Virtual Plannin

Featured Posts
Recent Posts
Archive